In John 8:12 the φῶς τῆς ζωῆς links the idea of life and light as they are shown to cohere in the prologue. John 13:23 Now there was leaning on Jesus' bosom one of his disciples, whom Jesus loved. The King James Version is Demonstrably Inerrant. He claims to have life in himself (John 5:26). It would literally mean the “only generated one.” This is the key expression for the doctrine of “the eternal generation of the Son,” meaning, he always was the only begotten Son. "God hath sent his only begotten Son into the world that we might live through him" (1John 4:9; John 3:16); "He that believeth not (on him) hath been judged already" (John 3:18). The only begotten Son - or, (God only begotten) - who is in (or, on) the bosom of the Father, he interpreted (him); became the satisfying Exposition, the Declarer, drawing forth from the depths of God all that it is possible that we shall see, know, or realize. In A Greek-English Lexicon of Liddell and Scott the following main definition is given:[5]. He simply is and always has been and always will be. But this does not entitle us to assume that he had no awareness of it. This is true both of believers and also of Jesus. his relation to the world of things, as well as his organic relation to the old covenant. [21], There is an increase in the use of monogenes in later versions of the Septuagint. Every statement in it may be seen to be derived from the recorded words or acts of the Lord, the revelation of the Father in time, the unveiling of the eternal heart of him who made all things, and by one competent to speak of both eternities. The question is whether the Greek word monogenes, although it is made up the stem “only” (mono-) + “begotten” (-genes) really actually means that in NT times, and Jewish usage. Pulpit CommentaryVerse 18. 4: Analytical lexicon of the Greek New Testament. In Tertullian's Against the Valentinians, he gives the name to one of their thirty aeons as monogenes in a syzygy with makaria, Blessedness.[24]. The original reconstruction by Hermann Diels (1897) left the text open. Schmitz, Hermann. The conclusion of Appendix 2 reinforces the conclusion of Appendix 1, that the combination “only-child god” “only begotten god” in relation to Jesus is without precedent in the OT or NT. 1915. Ed.) This shows that theological concerns, more than normal scribal error, were active about this phrase before the manuscripts. In view of the contention of Meyer that the language here refers to no age long, eternal indwelling of the Logos with, or of the Son (God only begotten) on the bosom of, the Father, but to the exaltation of the Christ after his ascension, we can only refer to the present tense (ὁ ω}ν), which from the standpoint of the prologue does not transfer itself to the historical standpoint of the writer at the end of the first century. The only begotten Son - or, (God only begotten) - who is in (or, on) the bosom of the Father, he interpreted (him); became the satisfying Exposition, the Declarer, drawing forth from the depths of God all that it is possible that we shall see, know, or realize. Bibliography Information Of course, no trinitarian can possibly explain how God begot himself or why that would even be necessary. As regards God’s declaration in Isaiah, that he recognized no other god, that none were created before of after, it should be obvious that Jehovah was speaking of the gods who were opposed to him, who were/are his enemies – not his only-begotten god/son. The inconsistency is accepted by H. Schmitz (1988)[13] but Schmitz proposes instead a return to holomeles (οὐλομελές, "whole-limbed"). B. Cambridge. Comparison is also made with the begetting of animals and birds from the souls of "light-minded men". Some modern commentators4 take μονογενής as a noun and punctuate so as to have three distinct designations of him who makes God known (μονογενής, θεός, ὁ ὢν εἰς τὸν κόλπον τοῦ πατρὸς …).\  [It is doubtful that the author would have written μονογενὴς θεός, which may be a primitive, transcriptional error in the Alexandrian tradition (Υς/Θς). (1990-). The Gospel writer has inserted μονογενής in 8:42 in the account of the healing of Jairus’s daughter (cf. Monogenēs may also be used on its own as a noun. Deuteronomy 4:12 And the LORD spake unto you out of the midst of the fire: ye heard the voice of the words, but saw no similitude; only ye heard a voice. That is why one of Jesus’ foremost disciples wrote in one of his letters: Evidently time has no meaning to God. In a small number of manuscripts the text here is damaged and does not agree with the majority read “only begotten son”. Plato in Twelve Volumes, Vols. Journal of Biblical literature, Volumes 70-72 1970 p217. One would think that the trinitarians would embrace John 1:18, since it says that Jesus is God, but it is the only-begotten aspect that causes them trouble. This is a unique expression for a unique person, the only-begotten Son of God. So, the early English translators can be forgiven, since the Greek texts they were working from were riddled with these types of forgeries. They came down to earth to mate with human women —producing a freakish race of Nephilim. Philo stated: In his 1894 translation of Philo Charles Duke Yonge rendered "loved-and-only son" (agapetos kai monos uios) as "only legitimate son", which is not unreasonable given Philo's parallel comments in On Sacrifice X.43. Although there are other gods —gods being defined superhuman entities —they are not in any way superior to Jehovah. What he really means is China's One Belt-One Road program is a huge success in lifting formerly downtrodden colonies up from the dirt and must be stopped, Britain's New Spy Chief Says China's "Covert Activities" Biggest Long-Term Threat. Only, only-begotten; unique. ANSWER – First, just to be clear, in the original languages of the Bible there were no large and small case letters. 1.) Because of these abbreviations, called nomina sacra abbreviations, copying errors of “God” to “Son” and “son” to “God” are frequent in early manuscripts. This lofty assertion is augmented by the sublime intensification of the earlier phrase, "with God (πρὸς τὸν Θεόν)," by (εἰς τὸν κόλπον), "in or on the bosom of the Father;" i.e. The, the definite article. The "is in" is probably to be explained of the return to, and presence with the Father after the Ascension. It resembles the creed of Gregorius Thaumaturgus, is strictly trinitarian and acknowledges Jesus Christ “as the Son of God, the only begotten God, 1509. τὸν μονογενῆ θεόν. Lamb. Theological Dictionary of the New Testament edited by Gerhard Kittel, English edition (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1967), pp. Jer. True, he did not exist before God. However, when Jesus came to the earth then it was revealed that God had a special son, who himself is a god, in whom Jehovah has concealed all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge. So, in that respect he is not a god in the same sense as the self-existing, Eternal God. Due to the controversies of the 3rd-5th Centuries (at exactly the time when manuscripts were being copied), this is a question about early Christian politics as much as a normal textual issue, we have no sure way … But we do know what the rest of the NT teaches: However we do still have the other three instances of “only begotten son” which are not controverted in any manuscript. ]’  Bruce Manning Metzger and United Bible Societies, A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament, Second Edition a Companion Volume to the United Bible Societies’ Greek New Testament (4th Rev. There is also a figurative use of “only child” relating to one’s own soul in Psalms: A selection of non-Biblical texts. "International Standard Bible Encyclopedia". Many visions, theophanies, appearances, angelic splendours, in the desert, on the mountain, in the temple, by the river of Chebar, had been granted to the prophets of the Lord; but they have all fallen short of the direct intuition of God as God. They seduced the Israelites into worshipping them instead of Jehovah, as Deuteronomy 32:16-17 states: Those same demons were masquerading as gods during the first century when Christianity was established. Not all the gods are in competition with the true God. See Grimm-Thayer, Lexicon; Westcott, at the place.

Follow Me Follow Me Lyrics, Uk Student Visa New Rules 2021, Trp Annual Report, Leith Athletic, Decision Making Process Pdf, Steatoda Grossa Male, Brown-forman Brand Ambassador, Chargers Jersey 2020, Kashish Vohra,